🛡️ THE ONLY HK WALL BED WITH
10-YEAR TRANSFERABLE WARRANTY
on the American SBLM patented mechanism · sole HK distributor · read terms →
Wallbed by Design 牆床·度身設計
📊 Compare options · ❓ FAQ · 🛡 Trust scorecard · ⭐ AS SEEN ON HK TV
📋 Complaint handling playbook

When a complaint arrives, here's exactly what to do.

A documented procedure beats ad-hoc improvisation. Ties the published commitments (SLA · Bill of Rights · dispute pathway) to actionable internal steps.

· Internal use · noindex

Why a written SOP matters

The published commitments — SLA, Bill of Rights, Trust Scorecard — describe what we promise. This page describes what we actually do when a complaint arrives. The two should be identical. If they drift, the public commitments stop being credible.

Use this when: a customer emails "DISPUTE", a Bill-of-Rights-violation report comes in, an SLA-claim screenshot lands, or a Consumer Council escalation is opened.

Step 1 — Triage within 1 working day

Within 1 working day of receipt, classify the complaint into one of these buckets:

Bucket What it looks like Owner Target resolution
A · SLA-credit claimCustomer cites a missed pledge with timestamp. Mostly automatic.FounderSame day
B · Warranty / install issueMechanism, latch, finish, anchor concern post-handback.Install lead5 working days on-site
C · Quote / contract disputeCustomer disputes a clause, charge, or deliverable scope.Founder14 working days
D · Bill of Rights violationSubject "BILL OF RIGHTS VIOLATION" — sales-pressure, refused refund, etc.Founder3 working days response
E · Public-record claimConsumer Council letter, Small Claims summons, lawyer letter.Founder + counselPer legal deadline

Bucket determines who owns it and how fast it must resolve. Don't combine buckets. If a customer's email contains both warranty + contract dispute, split into 2 cases.

Step 2 — Acknowledge within 24 hours

Whatever the bucket, send a confirmation reply within 24 hours. Template:

Hi [name],

We've received your message at [timestamp] and logged it as
case #[YYYY-MM-DD-001].

Bucket: [A/B/C/D/E]
Owner: [name]
Target resolution: [date]

We will reply with the outcome by [date]. If you have urgent
additional context, send it now to this email.

— [Owner name]
Wallbed by Design 牆床·度身設計
+852 4423 7445

Even bucket-A SLA credits get this acknowledgment. The "we received it" is itself a trust signal.

Step 3 — Investigate (proportional to bucket)

Step 4 — Resolution + closing email

Send a written closure with: (1) what we found, (2) what we're doing about it, (3) what the customer can do if they disagree.

Hi [name],

Following up on case #[id] from [date].

What we found:
- [Specifics. Don't sanitize.]

What we're doing:
- [Action. Date.]
- [If credit/refund: amount + payment date]

If you disagree with this resolution:
- Reply to this email — we'll re-open the case.
- If we still disagree, the Consumer Council pathway is at
  https://wallbed-hk.com/trust.html#disputes
  HK Consumer Council hotline: 2929 2222

Either way, thank you for telling us.

— [Owner name]
Wallbed by Design 牆床·度身設計

Step 5 — Document for the public record (if applicable)

If the case revealed a real mistake on our part:

  1. Add an entry to the next quarterly review of /trust.html "what we got wrong" with the year + sanitized description + policy change.
  2. If the case caused a process change, update the relevant policy page (warranty, contract, materials, etc).
  3. If the case revealed an SLA pledge that's hard to meet, consider whether the SLA should be revised — but only after at least 2 similar cases. One-off failures don't justify policy changes.
  4. Update /transparency-report.html with: count of complaints by bucket, median resolution time, public-record escalations. Once a year.

Tracking spreadsheet schema

| Case ID         | Received       | Customer initial | Bucket | Owner | Acknowledged   | Resolved        | Resolution         | Public-record? |
|-----------------|----------------|------------------|--------|-------|----------------|-----------------|--------------------|-----------------|
| 2026-05-12-001 | 2026-05-12 14:22 | Mr W            | A      | F     | 2026-05-12 18:45 | 2026-05-12 19:00 | HKD 200 credit Stage 3 | No             |
| 2026-05-15-002 | 2026-05-15 10:00 | Ms L            | B      | I     | 2026-05-15 16:30 | 2026-05-19 11:00 | Latch retorqued, no charge | No         |
| 2026-06-03-003 | 2026-06-03 09:15 | Dr C            | C      | F     | 2026-06-03 12:00 | 2026-06-09 17:30 | Contract clause clarified, no $ change | Yes — added to "what we got wrong" |

For 2027 transparency report this spreadsheet generates the audited complaint-resolution metrics. Without tracking, we can't publish the median time.

What NOT to do

Most complaints end at Step 1.

A 24-hour acknowledgment + an honest investigation handles ~90% of cases. Bucket E (public record) is rare. If the SOP feels heavy for a bucket-A SLA credit, that's the point — being fast and over-thorough on small things keeps the big ones from happening.

💬WhatsApp 📞4423 7445 📋Free quote
Also available from us: TST training room rental — from HK$700/2h